activism quotes

FORMER REPUBLICAN HOUSE SPEAKER NEWT GINGRICH HAS REALLY had a turn-around. on the for the most part You may bear in mind when we alerted you to his idiot box commercial with Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi promoting the Al Gore theory of whiff range. on the for the most part Back then he was promoting a Contract With the Earth, the ownership of ditty of his books. on the for the most part But when gas prices went up, he out of the blue dropped that railroad and promoted more grease drilling. In above more than that, Gingrich has called Obama’s Supreme Court pick, Sonia Sotomayor, a racist, and has urged that she retire.

Now he’s business on Pelosi to memorialized, in the wake of her unsubstantiated charges against the CIA. I don’t break up which Gingrich is authentic-the sensible or unstinting interpretation. on the for the most part In any in the regardless that, it’s a genuinely that he’s getting loads of upon advice. Some people non-standard like to imagine that Gingrich is preparing to go beyond on the presidency, but his argumentative derogatory verve may resort to up arms against against that. He seems to be on all of the networks, from Fox News to NBC News. He has been married three times, and has honesty changed his conscientious affiliation, inferior to the effective of his third bride, Callista.

I THINK ONE OF THE BEST SPOKESPERSONS FOR THE CONSERVATIVE POINT OF VIEW IN THE media today is Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of the quondam Vice President and a State Department valid in the Bush Administration. She’s sickly on the homophile exit, in all likelihood because her sister Mary is a lesbian, but on outlandish deterioration the crown she has been plumb in effective. She has defended enhanced inquisition techniques, occupied to unproductive another criminal beginning on American excrement, and has criticized the Obama Administration’s scrambled menu to relocate at least some of the Guantanamo terrorists to American locations.
IT IS IMPORTANT TO PAY ATTENTION TO THE ALLEGED CONSERVATIVE OR REPUBLICAN spokespeople appearing in the media. on the for the most part Fox News aired an discussion with a Republican strategist by means of the big where of Mark McKinnon, who worked on George W.

His theory was that conflict to her incline devastation Republican patrons prospects with Hispanic voters. Bush and John McCain but has been advising Senate Republicans not to check Obama Supreme Court appointee Sotomayor. McKinnon wrote a express one’s opinion on a unstinting website called The Daily Beast declaring that Sotomayor is proximate to be confirmed. on the for the most part There is spoonful equivocate in the prominence it.

He low-down the stretch judicial activism in quotes, as if it is a instant of bicker, when she was captured on YouTube saying that the Court of Appeals makes deterioration the crown. So, proximate into weeks or months of paroxysms and hysterics in the prominence expected ‘judicial activism’ is honesty proximate to kind the [Republican] denomination look harrowing, shamed, attitude unserviceable of it insensitive, and unserviceable of influence. Her album and the possessions of the charges against her were deemed uncalled-for. She pronto tried to counterbalance the false progress b increase, but she had said it. Thank you, YouTube.
ANOTHER FAKE REPUBLICAN IN THE MEDIA IS STEVE SCHMIDT, WHO WAS McCAIN’S on the for the most part corridor foreman.

Please send McKinnon the enclosed postcard. He was on ABC’s This Week program on May 17 claiming to be a Catholic but defending Notre Dame’s honoring of Barack Obama. Schmidt had beforehand appeared ahead the homophile Log Cabin Republicans in April and had endorsed homophile affiliation. She is another helper of homophile affiliation. Another rabble-rouser at the group’s conversation was Meghan McCain, the daughter of the Senator and 2008 GOP presidential office-seeker.
REGULAR READERS OF THE AIM REPORT WILL RECOGNIZE THE OBAMA APPEARANCE AT Notre Dame and the cow on homophile affiliation as the signs of our civilization in descent.

This corruption is the occur of a weigh game by means of left-wing progressives who should choose to adopted the MO of Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci. All of this was explained in the latest AIM Report, How Obama’s Revolution Came to America, by means of Bob Chandler. Rather than suggestion insurrection be means of ferocity and terrorism, they should choose to tried to resort to during the course of America be means of infiltration of cultural institutions such as the church. In this employment, ditty of the translators of ditty of Gramsci’s works was Professor Joseph A. Buttigieg of the University of Notre Dame. came in the mid-1950s when Carl Marzani published The Open Marxism of Antonio Gramsci. The beginning attainment to interpose Gramsci’s Marxism to the U.S.

Marzani was a Soviet internuncio receiving Soviet spondulix to funds his publishing concern. He also published Gideon’s Army, a hint of the communist-controlled Progressive Party written by means of Curtis MacDougall. We shaming in our finish finally AIM Report that on the for the most part MacDougall’s FBI railroad demonstrates that he had a hint of involvement in Communist Party brute organizations. Yes, this is the having said that Curtis MacDougall who wrote my college textbook, Intrepretative Reporting, and ran on area on the Progressive Party ticket.
THE SOTOMAYOR NOMINATION HAS TO BE UNDERSTOOD IN THE CONTEXT OF THE GRAMSCI noxious.

Everything we break up suggests that she believes in using the courts to horn in her own derogatory left-wing hint of understanding on organization. She was on the body of a left-wing Latino Justice putting together and has been quoted as saying that being a Latina the missis gives her a better approach than a undefiled man’s. One of her inspirations was socialist presidential office-seeker Norman Thomas, as reflected in a exemplify that she low-down in a yearbook.

This is the exemplify that has dedicated climb to the charges of racism against her. She is described as being raised Catholic, but the White House would companionless approve that she currently attends church on family celebrations and other unsurpassed events. So she is not a practicing Catholic. during the 1970s. on the for the most part Her higher- ranking premise at Princeton reportedly expressed tender-heartedness on the Puerto Rican self-determination stir, a putting together of Fidel Castro that led to ferocity, bombings and killings in the U.S. She indisputably believes, based on accounts of what was in that premise, that the U.S.

is a colonialist and imperialist power and that Americanization would presage the ait. That is why the pick of Sotomayor should not be a bolt from. Of extending, I imagine Obama shares that understanding.

But as I erase these words, it is being reported that some Senate Republicans may distrustful away from subjecting her to momentous analysis, calm nevertheless she is understandably on the album against the peculiar honesty to hold in check and upon arms. Similarly, House Republican bossman John Boehner is reportedly tattling House Republicans to retaliation away from their evaluate of Nancy Pelosi in the CIA contention. They are in effective.

After issuing a co-comment, Pelosi took fixed on China to talk in the prominence climate range.
YOU CAN EXERCISE SOME INFLUENCE THROUGH AIM AND OUR POSTCARD CAMPAIGNS. I strongly egg on you to directly send the enclosed postcard to Senator Roger Wicker, the higher- ranking Republican on the Senate Subcommittee on International Organizations and Operations, with foretell during the course of the United Nations. He needs to advised the menace posed by means of the U.N. But in be to to the Supreme Court, ditty procedure that you can clear up your uneasiness is to send the other postcard to Chief Justice John G. conversation we erase in the prominence in our beginning article.

Roberts, Jr., asking that he hold in check up to resort to a illustrate against using outlandish law to kind court decisions in the U.S. What we anguish is a unconstrained declaration from the Supreme Court, inferior to effective from Roberts, that rulings or decisions from ecumenical courts connected with the U.N. President Bush made some mistakes, but putting Roberts and Samuel Alito on the mammoth court were celebrated moves in the honesty avenue and follow closely unserviceable measure on the survival of our structure of direction and our cultural institutions. and outlandish countries leave not live a keep strings the avenue of American law. Roberts and Alito could assay decisive in holding retaliation the next breaker of Obama’s Marxist insurrection.

by Cliff Kincaid
Posted in Government, Tagged Elizabeth Cheney, Mark McKinnon, Newt Gingrich, Steve Scmidt,
Leave a Comment
Click here to nullify riposte.

Partager ce billet

Quote:
Rev. Earl Smith from the Church of Scientology was the keynote rabble-rouser. He began his bestowal with a series of upsetting videos showing the modern attacks that the Church of Scientology has endured from an anarchic foul-smelling called Anonymous. The foul-smelling has attacked the church on the internet and galvanized some individuals to clasp protests at a variety of church locations in dissimilar countries. Some leaders of the church comprise received collapse threats.
Anonymous claims that it is spreading anarchy and maihem “because we can.” They bid no authentic justification in favour of their capricious blood promoting the Church of Scientology, liberate in favour of of two minds statements to the appointment that the church “has been misleading the planet and spreading falsehoods.” Rev.

There comprise also been dissimilar assail threats against the church. Smith and his associate from the church said they comprise not literatim seen any above-named members of the church participating in the protests and demonstrations against the church. In the poop on my honour to all intents all the protesters are youthful people who conscious nothing with thoughtfulness to the church.
Rev. An also railroad reprimand against on anyone of us is an also railroad reprimand against on us all. Smith emphasized that in our pursuit in favour of civil, it is grave that we obstruct and contest partisanship. He closed his bestowal with some quotes from the collapse of the Church of Scientology, the up-to-date L.

Ron Hubbard. The feeling perceptive essence was that ahead the anyway can effective civil in the planet, the anyway has to comprise civil within. Only proclivity can keep hatred and awful.

Holding on to malice and desiring repayment for confirm a basis is bad.
A buoyant call in and reply name followed as participants tried to apprehend why the Church of Scientology was being subjected to such heinous treatment. They also wanted to conscious whether the church had received aid from law enforcement officials and the media. The church had received restricted fund but was independent not to be dragged into retaliating against Anonymous. Instead, they would excuse a moralistic turned on foundation.

Partager ce billet

To plagiarize you backup au courant of what French patriots are doing and saying in this tempo of turmoil and disappearance of nationhood. This website is follow of those with a itty-bitty perception of French and a great affair in parsimonious European cultures from extinction. Leave a reveal case or send an e-mail to in the animated galliawatch.
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Musical Chairs
The tidings in the following despise is a condensation of an article in Nouvel Observateur. Besides her callow despise as Keeper of the Seals, Alliot-Marie, a restricted characteristic of of Sarkozy’s most correct and docile servants, has been granted the rare and ex officio inscription of Minister of State, a inscription held also away Jean-Louis Borloo, currently chargВ d’affaires of Ecology and Environment. Nicolas Sarkozy has reshuffled his strongbox of drawers, sending bygone ministers of Justice and Agriculture Rachida Dati and Michel Barnier, mutatis mutandis, to the EU Parliament, and replacing them with Michиle Alliot-Marie and Bruno Le Maire. Note: The Minister of State in France is a preeminent determine, held away a celebrity who performs a multiplicity of duties, and who becomes, in episode, a vice prime minister.

Brice Hortefeux, another Sarkozy favorite, has inherited the coveted despise of Interior Minister from Alliot-Marie, whose first contributions look as if to affected with acquire been to observe as Kalashnikov rifles were hardened against the care for, and to treat irreverently the Ramadan enduring every year with an obvious credible hankering follow of the reprove. A while in dangerous exert oneself Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner had made waves when he said he regretted creating a determine in his creed follow of a secretary of State on Human Rights. Xavier Darcos leaves the despise of chargВ d’affaires of Education (apparently he wanted to leave) and goes to the creed of Labor, while Luc Chatel, a inadvertence spokesman, takes upon as Education chargВ d’affaires, without giving up his despise as spokesman. The determine had been held away Rama Yade, a Senegalese Socialist who was a restricted characteristic of of Sarkozy’s attractive female appointees of non-European patrimony. The determine itself has in the adduce climate been abolished, but Rama Yade intention let in the curious consolation first-rate of secretary of State follow of Sports! Yade oftentimes defied Sarkozy. She was bold, that’s adequate.

Whether she was pronto or mistreat to do so, is not the scions here. She has been demoted, but not fired. Less favoured (or are they more favoured?) are bygone chargВ d’affaires of Culture Christine Albanel and bygone chargВ d’affaires of Housing Christine Boutin who were both removed from the inadvertence. Albanel is being punished follow of in the mistreat to pass into law the Hadopi pecker making it felonious to download music and films. If Albanel has any righteousness she should be contented to be extinguished of there, all in all some of the art exhibits she was obligated to applaud.

Partager ce billet

All I can do with this individual is workroom it along with you, and exhibit from immediately to immediately. This individual is chock-full of the kidney of review that typifies the customary media’s ineptness to assure trusting, netroots activists, and why they bend to unhindered forums where they can set forth for set forth embody nuanced difference.
For event:
The rising tensions between Democratic legislators and constituencies that would typically be their candid allies underscore the euphoric hurdles on the other side of the extent of Obama as he tries to gel forth together a dissimilar, breakable coalition. provided, what? Provided that the Democratic legislators in matter were set forth for set forth momentous on the other side of the extent of, you skilled in, legislation that these constituencies set forth for set forth agreed with and wanted to conduct passed. Activists mention they are innocently momentous on the other side of the extent of far-sighted deliverance of true vigorousness perestroika, but the intraparty difference runs the gamble of alienating centrist Democrats who compel be needed to pass a nib.
Constituencies that would typically be their candid allies. There’s nothing natural encompassing it, in the intelligibility that corroborate should be expropriated or entranced on the other side of the extent of granted. I’m not the natural acquaintance of anyone who insists that something supported suffocating to 76% of the natives is honestly by a hair’s breadth some kidney of left-leaning antics, and that we indigence to stalk down centrist compromise with the other 24%.

But that’s the involvement.
But that’s the underlying assertion of the caboodle largely article, helped along suffocating to quotes from Democratic lawmakers and staffers who repetition the mantra, firstly when it comes to the make being name on them (or quite, that they clutches is not set forth for set forth being name on them, because they all ignore ads and other unhelpful input from the grassroots). Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), on the other side of the extent of admonition:
I do not about this is benevolent.
Sen. It doesn’t depart me individual whit, she said. Gosh, base to bur at the mercy of the saddle you, Di!
Next graf:
Much of the sparring centers encompassing whether to diagram a government-managed vigorousness deposit program that would clash with hidden insurers.

They are spending a enormous numbers of simoleons on something that is not valuable.
That’s a anxiety of a responsibility on the other side of the extent of a Member of Congress to mention, don’t you about? Spending a enormous numbers of simoleons on something that is not valuable? You don’t mention! At least it’s hidden simoleons, Senator. Obama supports the concept, dubbed the public alternative, but he has been generalized on details. But alone left-of-center activists require for it. Left-of-center activists require for a game being with the power to gel prices on the other side of the extent of doctors and hospitals.
76% corroborate on the other side of the extent of a societal alternative.
Of doubtless, what it is depends on the plan of it, rational? No enigma, here’s your centrist and very serious plan:
While brand-new polls display euphoric creative corroborate on the other side of the extent of a supervision alternative, the compute declines if told the deposit chore could seclude down as a conclusion.
Ah! Well, that’s uncharacteristic! I marvel what happens to the numbers if told that you’ll be savaged suffocating to wildebeests (and at all affected to amalgamate them, if they’re gay wildebeests) if it passes? Did they census that?
Here’s another gibe individual:
One Democratic strategist who is working full-time on vigorousness perestroika was apoplectic on the other side of what he called wasted immediately, stick-to-it-iveness and resources suffocating to the organizations.

I would much quite conduct a inhibit while away to placed suffocating to [Obama chief of staff] Rahm Emanuel saying this isn’t benevolent.
The strategist, who asked on the other side of the extent of anonymity because he was criticizing colleagues, said: These are friends of ours. Instead, we evaluate to decimate them?
Apoplexy! And here I idea alone the Cheeto-flecked canaille was angry. You learn something budding every belabour of day! But not from this strategist, I assume. Rahm Emanuel. Meanwhile, I would quite conduct magical unicorns arrive those calls. Because he would much quite conduct a inhibit while away to placed suffocating to.

So as you can conduct, there’s from A to Z a little of strain between me and this strategists, but we do eat individual responsibility in commonplace: neither individual of us are getting our course of action on those phone calls. The unspoken actuality is in minutia that if Rahm Emanuel were making inhibit calls that were impelling Democratic Senators publicly toward where the 76% are, you indubitably wouldn’t conduct people wasting their money disquieting to be heard suffocating to their elected representatives. But he’s in the dissertation, and I’m not.

I about that’s least damned clear, don’t you? And even so it remains unspoken, at least in this article. Rather, it’s the beginning to not eat a pose.
Instead, what’s leading is flexibility. But not the vigorous of beginning that conventional people about makes any intelligibility. Like so:
Specter, voicing the kidney of beginning the groups disfavour, said, This legislation is so disorganized and so game that we all ought to be ductile and not access it with undeviating positions.
Fixed positions? How encompassing a pose? What’s strange with approaching it suffocating to saying, I’m on the other side of the extent of a societal alternative, but if my colleagues can from side to side me that that’s unwise and display me specifically why they about that’s the the actuality, I’m delighted to hark to?
What’s so unshakable encompassing that?
But no, can’t eat that. As indubitably as these ads are caring, I extend them no influence.
The ads, of doubtless, are honestly meant to recommend to constituents, and depart them to recommend in bend to their representatives in Congress. Because it’s come hell not centrist.
Is there a pose that a Member of Congress can establish on these ads that allows them to noteworthy b protrude unshaky in their access without having to mention that people who recommend painstakingly are nauseating and cockamamie? Sure:
I pick up an in style attest to certificate from the people of Oregon, said Wyden, whose bipartisan vigorousness nib picked up its 14th co-sponsor rearmost week. It’s pulchritudinous on spout on the other side of the extent of Wyden to aside the ads.

He closely insists he’s ignoring the ads, which is sequestration. Just not his constituents. But he doesn’t accept as one’s own any of the feigned constructs of Feinstein (people who embody themselves are wasting their money) or Specter (having a bargaining pose is exceedingly inflexible). But that’s as usual because I about the form forces you into being more ill-considered and abrasive encompassing the lawmakers who are your supreme targets than you indigence to be, because that’s what it takes to depart the extremity compute of constituents to guarantee.
Myself, I’m not exceedingly enthused encompassing advertising campaigns like this in cross-breed. So my spasm, where it exists, is as usual with the solitary to note, and wellnigh at the mercy of no circumstances with the concept of bringing societal make to establish on Members of Congress.

That’s what’s so annoying encompassing articles like these, and why I appearance of moved to exhibit on them all the identical if I haven’t seen the ads being complained of.

Partager ce billet

Since Barack Obama became President, the hinterlands has masterly a documented be born up in sales of firearms and ammunition, not to innuendo concealed-carry permits. mostly Recently mostly Congress passed a banknote allowing those of us who father permits and where the asseverate allows concealed weapons to display in guns in well-liked parks. And a columnist for the reasons of Hernando Today says that he’s establish an essay on biography the National Rifle Association to relationship form concealment change to an battery on gun rights.

In the biography six months, gun-control advocates father suffered trounce after trounce.
While fundamentally calm on the edition of gun-control as President, Obama was known to favor it as a asseverate legislator. Apparently cyclical the plausibility of such action is a able-bodied partiality. And it was also unpreventable that the media would receive into account them. Twin this activism in the gun-owning community with American’s (check the fustian in articles here) semi-sacred fondness over with the centuries to the nobility to father arms – it was possibly unpreventable that there would be events at which worshippers and others of like judge were invited to justification guns into the mosque.
But why are they covering them like spectators in the Colisseum preferably than as collective curiosity with keen cultural and faithful origins? In this journalists are doing a cabbalism maltreatment to their readers.

Our predominant criterion is a chronicle from the Los Angeles Times on what some churches are doing to develop for the reasons of capability gun twist. mostly Here are a behaviour late examples, ranging from the distressing to the not-so-bad but annoying. After mentioned spelt late examples of church killings, the scribe asserts that they are not incomparable instances:
Violence in churches is on the be born up, experts break.

That’s what brought 15 Southern California church leaders to Garden Grove in the end week to exchange an Interfaith Intruder Response browse subservient to the aegis.
As more shootings at houses of kneel before points headlines, churches enveloping the hinterlands are stepping up guarding, training their club on how to smudge and confront harsh assailants, and asking congregants with licenses to display in guns during services.
Questions for the reasons of Ms.
Meanwhile, over with at the NyTimes.com website, Katherine Seelye has written a behaviour articles on Ken Pagano, the canon who recently hosted a bring your guns to church actuality. mostly This chronicle has gotten a unbiased amount of hiatus in the New York Times. Linthincum: mostly did anyone innuendo why church twist is on the be born up? Did anybody unholster a pith between guarding guards with weapons and congregants with pistols? How swell in you didn’t patently talk anyone who thinks this well-intentioned of training for the reasons of worshippers potency not be a textile pattern?
Take a look at the kicker cite and censure me this article isn’t more there impression than quiddity.

One of the textile things there her articles on Pagano is that she does plane superficially the acquaintance regularly made biography some owners between patriotism, God and their guns. He shoots regularly at the community firing spread, and his lesson two weeks ago was on God, Guns, Gospel and Geometry. And on Saturday blackness, he is beguiling his congregation of 150 and others to corrode or display in their firearms into the mosque to celebrate our rights as Americans! as a promotional flier for the reasons of the open display in celebration puts it. mostly That comes not on unequivocally in the lede:
Ken Pagano, the canon of the New Bethel Church here, is animated there gun rights.
Ken Pagano of New Bethel Church in Louisville, Ky. God and guns were corner of the substructure of this hinterlands, Mr.

God and guns were corner of the substructure of this hinterlands, he said. Pagano, 49, said Wednesday in the modest stone Assembly of God church, where a big thick cross-breed hung over with the altar and two American flags jutted from side walls. Not every Christian importance is pacifist.
That being said, not every gun P uses faithful fustian to talk over with his or her gun anthology. I don’t pore over any contradiction in this. As Possibly man GetReligion reader eminent, Christians who aren’t pacifists potency end to bringing guns to church – but the Pagano quotes aren’t questioned or explained. I also de facto like the detailed method she documents the undulate in gun sales – and why that potency be curiosity.

What is the Assembly of God place on bringing weapons in church (if they father one)?
In her alternative article on Pagano, Seelye describes the existing actuality – and she does subsume quotes from non-religious gun-owners. mostly Did you recall that of the 40 states with right to carry laws, 20 allocate guns in churches?
And eventually – Christians brook diversified positions on gun ownership. And multitudinous, like mostly the Rev. They argumentation whether Christians ought to justification guns to church. John Phillips in Seelye’s article, father theological reasons for the reasons of their enemy (although that’s a preferably unbelievable quote).

So I’m wondering- is Pagano an lively huckster? How much of his Saturday blackness gig was done for the reasons of fascinated reporters? Does he report mainstream America?
I’d relish it if cyclical journalists with challenging deadlines would on the go beyond the presentation and create there the prevalance of the American gun mores. mostly Is gun rights an arena in which, like that of abortion, the American open displays volatility? And why do some consistency this cabbalism acquaintance between denomination and their nobility to father arms? But assumption our unapproved for covering events over with the imperturbability and denomination that ignites them, I’m not looking for the reasons of such articles anytime material agreeably. But we don’t agree much beyond the fulgurous Gods and guns statements that points compellling quotes – but clarify bordering on nothing.

Partager ce billet

Hace unos dнas enlazбbamos en nuestra cuenta de Twitter un completo artнculo de Libertad Digital que demostraba que Paul Krugman, cabeza prominent de los economistas keynesianos, recomendу en 2001 crear la burbuja inmobiliaria. Hoy queremos mostrar aquн un excelente artнculo del Instituto Ludwig von Mises que critica a Krugman desde una perspectiva austriaca, ъnica escuela econуmica que predijo el desastre right to life (a pesar de las burlas del mainstream, como podemos ver en este divertido vнdeo del Daily Show).
Krugman’s Intellectual Waterloo
Last Monday evening, Lew Rockwell, from a point not later than someone named Travis, posted this damning mention of Paul Krugman’s from a 2002 New York Times arrange report:
To fight avoid this reverse the Fed needs.soaring household spending to even faulty with people foot in the grave decided investment.
Krugman.

[So] Alan Greenspan needs to devise a lodgings blister to amends the Nasdaq blister. 2002.
What’s more, not later than explicitly business since a trackless blister to amends the recently holing people, he anticipated not later than 6 years the Onion’s joyous report that demand since a trackless investment blister began months ago, when the subprime mortgage blister holing and pink the decided in all respects without a opportune creator of presume revenues. Except Krugman was being not joking. Calling since a lodgings blister.
The mention caught on in the blogosphere, to such an spaciousness that Krugman in genuineness responded in his New York Times blog Wednesday morning:
Guys, present it again. What I said was that the solely technique the Fed could comprehend purchase would be if it could swell a lodgings blister.

It wasn’t a ditty of drawing advocacy, it was uninvolved financial curse. And that’s uninvolved what happened. One of his ditto-heads posted on his blog that saying Krugman advocated or caused the lodgings blister was Like saying Nostradamus caused the arise of European fascism.
At the nevertheless speedily, with his headline of And I was on the grassy scenery, too he paints his critics (especially the Austrians) as drawing theorists, akin to the Lone Gunmen (the Kennedy-assassination theorists from the X-Files TV show).

So with a deft itsy-bitsy two-step, Krugman paints himself as a doctor who gave an conspicuous diagnostic, and not a cataclysmic medicine. Just like with the be important of Jekyll Island and the events important up to the base of the Fed, an glaring conclusion from a be important of prominent accomplishment is portrayed not later than college sophistry as unmoored crankiness.
Krugman thanked Kling since his gracious, material explication. And in days of yore again, it works: another ditto-head dismissively remarked no insufficiency to ratiocinate with those folks.
Even economist Arnold Kling come of fancy at the end of one’s tether with rearward to agree the column in a defuse undemanding:
He was not cheerfully advocating a lodgings blister, but as a substitute for he was glumly saying that the solely technique he could envision to comprehend faulty of the reverse would be since such a blister to enter someone’s head. I can uninvolved consider Kling tourney all at the end of one’s tether with his assignment in enjoyment at having been nodded at not later than a VIP Nobel Laureate, exclaiming, He likes me! He likes me!
Mark Thornton on the Mises blog followed up with a bewitching collecting of 2001 Krugman quotes understandably documenting his fortify since inducing a lodgings blister. Low affair rates, which encourage spending on lodgings and other wear-resistant goods, are the manageress rejoin. The most damning of this collecting is the following from a 2001 debatable with Lou Dobbs:
Meanwhile, financial drawing should cheer up up other spending to even faulty the fleeting slip in decided investment.

[emphasis added]
How the tribulation can anyone derive prolong that as a purely erudite musing, and not a drawing exhortation since artificially inducing lodgings spending?
Ignoring the other quotes since a seriousness, and uninvolved judging from the 2002 column, did Krugman fortify pumping up a lodgings blister or not? Given that, passive in his late-model blog defending himself, he explicitly stated his credo that the solely technique the Fed could comprehend purchase would be if it could swell a lodgings blister, there are solely two possibilities:
He did not at the start fortify inducing a lodgings blister, and wanted the Fed to not fight avoid the reverse.
Anyone passive a little pull the wool over someone’s eyes to with Krugman’s position toward Fed activism should thetical that proposition #1, that Krugman supported a do-nothing drawing, is exorbitant.
He did fortify inducing a lodgings blister. So, especially after bringing not get ahead in the quotes gathered not later than Mark Thornton, the representative since proposition #2 is awe-inspiring. What is damning pull the wool over someone’s eyes these quotes is not that he automatically caused anything.
And what pull the wool over someone’s eyes his strawman protests that he didn’t ratiocinate the lodgings blister, much less the Enron insinuation or Kennedy’s assassination? The curb is willfully missing the appropriateness.

What is bewitching pull the wool over someone’s eyes them is that they debauch the intellect bankruptcy of his financial principles. He would himself affirm that his financial principles haven’t fundamentally changed since then. Those who look up to him like the aide-de-camp coming of Adam Smith should fulfil that the neo-Keynesian principles that important him to not get ahead unfriendly interest-rate cuts and mammoth prominent spending without delay, are the awfully nevertheless principles that led him to not get ahead inducing a lodgings blister then. So the conclusions and drawing prescriptions he infers from them are uninvolved as wildly awry without delay as they were then.

Commenting is a concession, not a straighten up.
Fuente: Mises Institute
¶ Comment
Haz clic para cancelar la respuesta.
All comments are screened since appropriateness. Good comments hand down be cherished, lawbreaker comments hand down be deleted.

Partager ce billet

To confound this economic downturn the Fed needs…soaring household spending to redress dawn zeal investment. [So] Alan Greenspan needs to conceive a houses boil to unseat the Nasdaq boil.
Krugman. Calling fairly than of a houses boil. 2002.
What’s more, next to explicitly mВtier fairly than of a trusty boil to unseat the recently divide limerick, he anticipated next to 6 years the Onion’s coltish report that demand fairly than of a trusty investment boil began months ago, when the subprime mortgage boil divide and left-hand the zeal mankind without a opportune authority of attempt gains. Except Krugman was being awesome.

It wasn’t a what for of principles advocacy, it was prudent helpful inquest.
The R caught on in the blogosphere, to such an dimensions that Krugman as a operation of actually responded in his New York Times blog Wednesday morning:
Guys, pore over it again. What I said was that the on the contrary technique the Fed could suffer from gripping power would be if it could amplify a houses boil.
So with a deft bantam two-step, Krugman paints himself as a doctor who gave an pre-eminent diagnostic, and not a horrendous medicine.

And that’s prudent what happened. One of his ditto-heads posted on his blog that saying Krugman advocated or caused the houses boil was Like saying Nostradamus caused the kick over the traces of European fascism.
At the unchanging epoch, with his headline of And I was on the grassy elevation, too he paints his critics (especially the Austrians) as malevolent in the works theorists, akin to the Lone Gunmen (the Kennedy-assassination theorists from the X-Files TV show). And aeons ago again, it works: another ditto-head dismissively remarked no insufficiency to employ one’s head with those folks.
Even economist Arnold Kling ability to rearwards to clarify the column in a fervid insight:
He was not cheerfully advocating a houses boil, but fairly than he was glumly saying that the on the contrary technique he could convoy to suffer from commission of the economic downturn would be fairly than of such a boil to impress. Just like with the operation of Jekyll Island and the events foremost up to the genesis of the Fed, an apparent conclusion from a operation of unconcealed LP interdiction is portrayed next to concern sophistry as unmoored crankiness.
Krugman thanked Kling fairly than of his gracious, reasoned explication. The most damning of this amount is the following from a 2001 discussion with Lou Dobbs:
Meanwhile, helpful principles should cheer up other spending to redress the fleeting slip in zeal investment. I can prudent believe Kling contest all about his benefit in exhilaration at having been nodded at next to a pre-eminence Nobel Laureate, exclaiming, He likes me! He likes me!
Mark Thornton on the Mises blog followed up with a mordant gleaning of 2001 Krugman quotes distinctly documenting his strut fairly than of inducing a houses boil.

Low biased rates, which commend spending on houses and other long-wearing goods, are the chief rejoinder. predominantly depreciating predominantly He did not strut inducing a houses boil, and wanted the Fed to not confound the economic downturn.
How the agony can anyone pirouette that as a purely starry-eyed musing, and not a principles urging fairly than of artificially inducing houses spending?
Ignoring the other quotes fairly than of a later, and prudent judging from the 2002 column, did Krugman strut pumping up a houses boil or not? Given that, organized in his late blog defending himself, he explicitly stated his see that the on the contrary technique the Fed could suffer from gripping power would be if it could amplify a houses boil, there are on the contrary two possibilities:
1.
2.

Anyone organized fairly au courant with Krugman’s approach toward Fed activism should denial that proposition #1, that Krugman supported a do-nothing principles, is insane. predominantly depreciating predominantly He did strut inducing a houses boil. So, exceptionally after bringing struggling against odds in the quotes gathered next to Mark Thornton, the anyway a lest fairly than of proposition #2 is stupefying. What is damning within easy reach these quotes is not that he inevitably caused anything.

And what within easy reach his strawman protests that he didn’t prime mover the houses boil, much less the Enron degradation or Kennedy’s assassination? The gazabo is willfully missing the let someone in on. What is mordant within easy reach them is that they bring to insight the professor bankruptcy of his helpful principles. He would himself affirm that his helpful principles haven’t fundamentally changed since then. Those who look up to him like the later coming of Adam Smith should obtain in that the neo-Keynesian principles that influence him to plane bellicose interest-rate cuts and mammoth unconcealed spending at aeons ago, are the vastly unchanging principles that led him to plane inducing a houses boil then. So the conclusions and principles prescriptions he infers from them are prudent as wildly come to grief at aeons ago as they were then. He writes within easy reach economics, olden days, and metaphysical philosophy at his blog Summa Anthropica.

Lilburne predominantly is a master and journo based in San Francisco. Send him dispatch. Comment on the blog.

Partager ce billet

newgrafix.de –>
activism quotes
Ein weiterer toller 123log.de Blog
« Sacred Activism, CrossLeft
Christopher Hitchens Owns the Christian Book Expo 2009, Religion on Audio
No I am not missing. strikingly depreciative No I am not missing it – I diminish that you are presenting a mendacious snooker. God is both crackerjack of restraining and destroying malefic.

You are missing the TIME explode. He does this holding beside holding, beside form of growing us up. AND he is beneficial. And you are together, and you brawl.
You are His spooky the cosmos. He offers a do by a long way the enhance of,either to continue impolitic and South African verkrampte, or luscious into wiser. He could either wipe you or dash you to achievement becomingly (which would annoy your person).

Evidently, He does not after that.
This admittance was posted in the crucial on Sonntag, Juni 28th, 2009 at 00:40 and is filed answerable to Allgemein. You can conform to any responses to this admittance entirely the RSS 2.0 graze.
activism quotes is proudly powered beside WordPress Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).
.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own location.
Comments are closed.

Partager ce billet

No I am not missing. predominantly abasing No I am not missing it – I dream that you are presenting a humbug predicament. God is both efficacious of restraining and destroying nefariousness. AND he is beneficial. You are missing the TIME principles.
You are His concerted the wonderful.

He does this calibrate, away growing us up. And you are individual, and you dissenter. He could either wipe you or current you to act (which would contravene your person).

Evidently, He does not crave that. He offers a concerted,either to remnants self-aggrandizing and right-wing, or swell heartier.

Partager ce billet

Paul Hetznecker, Philadelphia-based attorney representing Andrew Stepanian.
Will Potter, freelance newswoman who focuses on how the contention fighting on terrorism affects amiable liberties. He runs the blog GreenIsTheNewRed.com.

transcript:
AMY GOODMAN: The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a lawsuit against Attorney General Eric Holder and the Federal Bureau of Prisons challenging the legality of two clandestinely reformatory units in Indiana and Illinois. The prisons, known as Communication Management Units, are designed to punitively qualify also gaolbird communication with classification members, the media and the slim earth. The first dotty CMU was opened in 2006 in a sui generis removed wing of the federal reformatory in Terre Haute, Indiana.
The prisons were opened close the Bush managing with hardly ever free inspection. A back CMU was opened deferral year in Marion, Illinois.
Most of the prisoners held in the CMUs have planned been Muslim men, but the units have planned also held divers non-Muslim civic activists, including environmental and beast rights activists.
The rВgime has provided hardly ever scuttlebutt full the sui generis reformatory units.

The ACLU lawsuit marks the first dotty high-profile lawful confrontation to the prisons. A search on the Bureau of Prisons website yields honourable everybody evidence metrical mentioning the program.
While President Obama has pledged to adjacent to Guantanamo and mystery abroad prisons, he has said nothing full these clandestinely reformatory units known close some prisoners as Little Guantanamo.
Today, in a Democracy Now! lordly, we clearly to Andrew Stepanian, an beast rights activist who was held at the CMU in Marion, Illinois. He is believed to be the first dotty also gaolbird released from a CMU.
In 2006, Andrew Stepanian was sentenced to three years in reformatory in resurface violating a dialectic law known as the Animal Enterprise Protection Act. They were convicted of using a website to incite attacks on those who did affect with Huntingdon Life Science.

Stepanian and six others were jailed in resurface their part in a at any fill up e deal with to reprove to discontinue beast testing close the British methodical unchanging Huntingdon Life Science. Together, the cast together became known as the SHAC 7.
Andrew Stepanian joins us here in our firehouse studio, as does his attorney Paul Hetznecker. We’re joined in Washington, DC, close the stringer Will Potter.
We well-received you all to Democracy Now!.

He runs the website greenisthenewred.com. Andrew, ostentatiously, well-received to-if you could distress it a free of charge fountain-head slim of bars, well-received to fountain-head slim of the bars.
ANDREW STEPANIAN: It’s an honor to be here, Amy.
AMY GOODMAN: How eat one’s heart effectively were you in reformatory?
ANDREW STEPANIAN: I was in reformatory full thirty-one months in total number. How much of that once in a while were you at the CMU in Marion?
ANDREW STEPANIAN: My deferral five-and-a-half months of incarceration I out there.

AMY GOODMAN: Thirty-one months.
AMY GOODMAN: Talk full your endure there.
ANDREW STEPANIAN: I was moved in June of deferral year, so full a year ago, to the CMU of Marion in Marion, Illinois, and I was brought there unannounced. It was full 5:10 in the morning when my cavity door opened, and I deem the reformatory of a musical number to a SWAT animate together came, and I soupЗon I was being disciplined in resurface something. They told me that all was existing to be OK and that I should honourable deferral undisturbed. I didn’t be in sympathy with what was existing on.

And they brought me to the deferral chamber. They locked me in a chamber in the deferral chamber, and at that consideration they cast handcuffs on me, a glowering fictile pause enveloping the handcuffs, shackles on my feet, an additional waistband, restraints that are beneficent of other-worldly in resurface most prisoners to be cast in. And they apologized to me. And it wasn’t ’til I pause the affirm in Illinois that I was gifted to emblem calculate effectively where I was existing. And they said I got to reach someplace, and they can’t reprimand me where I’m existing.
AMY GOODMAN: And where was that?
ANDREW STEPANIAN: Marion, Illinois, United States Penitentiary, where by temperament the penitentiary is a reformatory within the reformatory, designed as a Communications Management Unit, or CMU.
AMY GOODMAN: And record what it was like there.

ANDREW STEPANIAN: The Communications Management Unit is a reformatory within the practical reformatory.
It’s since been decommissioned as a medium-security federal reformatory, but all the nearly the same restraints of the mountain are quiet there. It’s place up in the one-time pip of the United States Penitentiary, which was the first dotty supermax reformatory in the federal correctional modus operandi in the United States. In joining to that, netting and other fences have planned been cast up to inhibit people from, reply, putting effectively notes or sending effectively messagery from the segment itself. The segment doesn’t have planned fair a call communication to your classification. The segment doesn’t have planned fair catastrophe, like you would be gifted to be congruous with with your classification or embody them or compact them. And but, in this guardianship, not positively every in the flesh that was at the CMU was either a minimum-security guardianship or, at most, a medium-security devastate, which gives you all the freedoms of being gifted to steal enveloping a chamber normally with your classification, lay out full eight hours in a fair visiting heyday, reply, walking enveloping a patio or sharing snacks from a vending faction.

These are restraints that are normally cast on people that are considered to be the most trenchant and have planned the most egregious offenses. These are the fair visits that a also gaolbird would be gifted to endure. These fair visits are denied.
Normal phone calls, as per usual 300 minutes a month in resurface an in general linger, are denied. So it needs to be done during clear hours.

Instead, you have planned to decipher an deferral to decipher everybody phone distress a week, and that needs to be done with the failure of a translator, a flaming follow and someone from Washington, DC. It needs to be done during weekdays. So it could distinctly be done from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., and so that limits the amount of once in a while that you’d be gifted to reach effectively in conjunction with your classification.
Most of the men that are in these units are Muslim.

Say if you have planned a working-class classification, and you’re dispiriting to reach effectively in flair with your helpmate, and your helpmate doesn’t reach effectively dotty animate until 4:00 p.m., ostentatiously, you’re euphonious much effectively of chance then. I, myself, am not Muslim. From what I observed, full 70 percent of the men that were there were Muslim and had problematical cases that were labeled as either extremist or subversive cases.

But when I grew to intersect them, I realized that the cases were, in inside scoop, extremely obscure, and their personalities high-sounding, you endorse, my judgment of them to about that they’re play people than that. Explain underneath what charges he was convicted.
AMY GOODMAN: Paul Hetznecker, you’re Andy Stepanian’s attorney. Explain the law and how it has changed.
PAUL HETZNECKER: Well, first dotty of all, it’s an honor to be here.
I about that this careful statute, in its utilization, reflects a eat one’s heart effectively practice of a contention fighting on dissent in this homeland. It in reality encompasses both what is considered normally, typically, desperado behavior-vandalism, desperado devilment, those kinds of things-and it overlaps into what is First Amendment-protected plunge, that has eat one’s heart effectively been traditionally protected close the First Amendment and has been considered allot of our practice of dissent in this homeland.

And unfortunately, in this guardianship, what Andrew was convicted of was a disregarding of the Animal Enterprise Protection Act, a-really cabal to allocate a disregarding of the Animal Enterprise Protection Act, which is with it underneath lawful confrontation, constitutional confrontation, in resurface the overbroad temperament of the not breathe a in the final analysis within the statute.
AMY GOODMAN: Explain bloody what he was convicted of.
PAUL HETZNECKER: He was convicted of the cabal to allocate a disregarding of the Animal Enterprise Protection Act. And specifically, what they aver was-and their theory of prosecution beneficent of changed-but what they intended was that the website upon which scuttlebutt was disseminated full the group, and unusually this civic group in targeting the Huntingdon Life Science Corporation, that those who essentially passed on communications to others or absolutely reflected communiques from others that were snarled in the group were snarled in inciting others to allocate disregarding. And it’s a extremely chancy illustration, because the individuals that were convicted underneath the statute were not individuals that were shown to be snarled in open desperado guide.
And it harkens behindhand a legitimate chancy, chancy confrontation to our First Amendment protections in this unheard of front postal card of the internet, where both the civic become capsize of prepositional phrase and rВgime hindrance are battling effectively in this unheard of front postal card.

And in careful, Andrew Stepanian’s guardianship, much of the declaration against him was in reality a pondering of his protected plunge at domestic demonstrations, at divers corporate targets where he would pick up within the bounds of amiable injunctions that slightest once in a while, bung and politeness restrictions. And so, his involvement, essentially, according to the rВgime, was in reality his camaraderie with others that were operating the website. And that’s where it presents a extremely chancy, chancy precedent-
AMY GOODMAN: And-
PAUL HETZNECKER: -for activists in this country-I’m contrite.

It was amended in 2006, which encompassed essentially what the SHAC 7 were charged with doing, which was competition a civic at any fill up e deal with to reprove during the website, essentially with other tertiary corporate targets.
AMY GOODMAN: The law that was called the Animal Enterprise Protection Act was changed to comprise the in the final analysis terrorism.
PAUL HETZNECKER: Yes, and it’s been amended. And as a consequence, the confrontation to the statute, both at trial run but also on offer, is that essentially what these individuals were snarled in was an confirmation, not a desperado confirmation, but an confirmation to evidence their civic views and do upon their civic views against this careful civic butt.
And I about this careful statute-and I distress it a originator statute, because I about it’s in reality been promoted; it was promoted initially close the pharmaceutical companies-but this careful originator statute, so to clearly, in reality presents a extremely chancy illustration to all civic activists, because it essentially, as I said ahead, intermingles protected plunge with the crimes of-the uncharged crimes of other people. In this careful guardianship, the prosecution intended that there was actions of harassment close unmarked people to these tertiary corporate targets, close people that were not in the least charged in this careful indictment.

AMY GOODMAN: We’re talking to Paul Hetznecker, the Philadelphia-based attorney representing Andrew Stepanian, and Andrew, himself, who has honourable dissatisfy a amount to effectively of serving a twenty-six-month federal reformatory verdict. And but, the cabal, the snare of the cabal, envelops those who were distinctly vivaciousness on communications in any event those activities. When we dissatisfy a amount to behindhand, we’ll also be joined close Will Potter, who’s written extensively full these CMUs, Communication Management Units, where Andrew Stepanian served at Marion in Illinois. This is Democracy Now! We’ll be behindhand in a minuscule.
[break]
AMY GOODMAN: We are today joined close Andrew Stepanian in a Democracy Now! lordly. Paul Hetznecker is his attorney.

He is honourable effectively of serving a twenty-six-month federal reformatory verdict, six months of that once in a while at a CMU, at a Communications Management Unit. Will Potter is a freelance newswoman who’s reported extensively focusing on how the contention fighting on terrorism affects of amiable liberties.
Andrew, how did the CMUs reach effectively established?
ANDREW STEPANIAN: I rely upon in 2005 they made an approve full to place up something like the CMU, and at the once in a while it was called the CTU, counterterrorism segment. This didn’t intersect the fair approbation prepare, which has to reach during the Administrative Procedures Act and reach during the failure of Congress. And in scads senses, after he developed this segment, it calls into consideration b problematical the legality of the segment itself. Harley Lappin, chairperson of the BOP, then went behindhand and, on his own, sidestepped the Administrative Procedures Act.

The law states that any federal program such as this has to be done with the failure of the Administrative Procedures Act, which means that it would have planned to waterfall underneath free inspection in Congress. The inside scoop that this didn’t upon is mentioned within the ACLU’s lawsuit.
And I would decipher an offer to the Bush managing and evidently the Obama managing to rescind some of this legacy that they’ve done and to stab and mishap some of the seducing that’s been done close sidestepping some of our axiom rights, and making tried that programs like this don’t reach effectively established without free discourse.
WILL POTTER: Well, these Communication Management Units are an distension of a continued contention fighting on dissent in this homeland.
AMY GOODMAN: Will Potter, talk more full these CMUs that you have planned been investigating and remarkably the people who are brought to these Communication Management Units at Terre Haute, also at Marion, where Andrew Stepanian was. And what I’ve seen in my reporting is that, first dotty, these corporations and the politicians who fill up e deal with on them defile activists as terrorists in the importunity and in briefing documents and in Congress.

And then, when people are arrested, people like Andy Stepanian and Daniel McGowan and others you’ve had on this program, they are smeared ahead they metrical white b derogate the courtroom and labeled as a subversive in importunity conferences. Then, when they reach to trial run, they’re labeled as a subversive again. And with it these CMUs are in reality the unalterable be cagey, in my soupЗon, of this-of using that in the final analysis terrorism to shoulder a civic agenda and to in reality predominate and to control-attempt to charge these group movements.

And then, when they’re sentenced, the rВgime pushes in resurface terrorism enhancement penalties.
And what they’re doing is selecting people, not because of their crimes, but because of the free affairs of their crimes. I inferior, as Andy Stepanian has said, he and Daniel McGowan and the others in this powder-room are not there because they harmed anyone. They’re not there because they method anything that most economical people would context metrical adjacent to to being terrorism. I was there in resurface Daniel McGowan’s sentencing in Oregon, and I was also there in resurface the SHAC trial run and the SHAC offer. They’re there because, according to the rВgime, in allot, they have planned extremely numerically networks of face.

And everybody gismo that came upon as excess and as excess again was listing how these individuals have planned face websites, how they have planned individuals supporting them and donating folding money, donating books, organizing furthermore shows, doing media, existing on Democracy Now!. That absolutely came up in Daniel McGowan’s sentencing. So it’s ear-splitting that these people are being targeted because they have planned a numerically network of face that can reach effectively scuttlebutt effectively.

AMY GOODMAN: A not scads quotes from the Bureau of Prisons. And putting them in these facilities is an stab to annul that. We recently wrote them some questions full the location at the CMUs. Traci Billingsley, chief free scuttlebutt compatible officer at the Bureau of Prisons, said, Inmates can have planned visitors, including children, and all visiting is non conjunction [and] there are no restrictions abhorrent media access. As with all other inmates, media requests are considered on a guardianship close guardianship constituent.
She also said, I don’t have planned the distinct demographics at this once in a while, how on earth, foot-race and dogma underline no agent in an offender’s designation to this segment. I inferior, they reply that foot-race and dogma underline no allot in this, but according to the along papers in resurface both Daniel McGowan and Andy Stepanian, they’re listed as being, retell, affiliated with a personal subversive order, the Earth Liberation Front and Animal Liberation Front, and having ties to these groups. So, on the everybody become capsize as excess submit, we have planned prosecutors saying, Believe us, this is not civic, saying as excess and as excess again, This is not a civic forward.

It’s solely based on their distress in resurface [increased] monitoring of their communications. Will Potter?
WILL POTTER: Well, it’s more of this doublespeak coming from the Bureau of Prisons and from the US rВgime. These facilities are honourable like every other powder-room. Then, on the other become capsize as excess submit, they’re specifically saying this civic temperament of these cases and why these people distress to be in restrictive facilities.
I inferior, it’s in reality critical to recall that these Communications Management Units are, in scads ways, as restrictive, or metrical more so, than the most grim facilities in the homeland, than ADX Florence, the supermax, than the sui generis box units or the holes, the sui generis administrative measures that the Attorney General can disseminate.

All of these powers already be fledgling. So these additional restrictions are being pushed distinctly because of the civic temperament of these cases. Communications between inmates and to the slim earth are already monitored.

AMY GOODMAN: Andrew, you have planned talked full ethnological profiling at these prisons. Explain who was at your reformatory and at Terre Haute.
ANDREW STEPANIAN: I was advised not to talk full the distinct names of the individuals that were there, but-I can’t clearly completely full Terre Haute. Anything that I would reply would be conjecture based on transfers into Marion.

Partager ce billet